From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Litton

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 16, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-36577 (N.M. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2018)

Opinion

NO. A-1-CA-36577

01-16-2018

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FREDDIE LAMAR LITTON, Defendant-Appellant.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Cristina T. Jaramillo, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge. {1} Defendant has appealed from convictions for possession of a controlled substance, tampering with evidence, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting, evading, or obstructing an officer. Most recently, we issued a second notice of proposed summary disposition in which we proposed to reverse the conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia, and to affirm the other convictions. {2} Defendant has filed a response with this Court indicating that he continues to oppose our proposed summary disposition with respect to the convictions for possession of a controlled substance, tampering with evidence, and resisting, evading, or obstructing an officer; however, he agrees with our proposed reversal of the conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia. The State has filed no responsive memorandum. {3} Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

{4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge /s/ _________
HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Litton

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Jan 16, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-36577 (N.M. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Litton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FREDDIE LAMAR LITTON…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Jan 16, 2018

Citations

NO. A-1-CA-36577 (N.M. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2018)