From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lindsey

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 11, 2010
309 S.W.3d 873 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. ED93645.

May 11, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 0722-CR03868, Angela T. Quigless, Judge.

Andrew E. Zleit, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Terrence M. Messonnier, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before GLENN NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Torrey Lindsey appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree trafficking. We find that the trial court did not err in overruling Lindsey's objection to testimony regarding an anonymous tip, nor did the court err in excluding certain testimony at trial. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Lindsey

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 11, 2010
309 S.W.3d 873 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Lindsey

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Torrey LINDSEY, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

309 S.W.3d 873 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Lindsey v. Russell

Finally, this Court has already found on [Lindsey]'s direct appeal that excluding the anonymous tip…