Summary
concluding that Lindsey did not show justifiable dissatisfaction and citing State v. Staten, 304 Kan. 957, 377 P.3d 427, 437, which holds that justifiable dissatisfaction “may be demonstrated by showing a conflict of interest, an irreconcilable disagreement, or a complete breakdown in communication between counsel and the defendant.”
Summary of this case from Lindsey v. SchnurrOpinion
No. 116,971
09-28-2018
STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Jeremy James LINDSEY, Appellant.
Michael P. Whalen, of Law Office of Michael P. Whalen, of Wichita, for appellant. Rachel L. Pickering, assistant solicitor general, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.
Affirmed.