Opinion
Argued May 17, 1939 —
Decided September 22, 1939.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 122 N.J.L. 137.
For the plaintiff in error, J. Henry Harrison and Samuel I. Kessler.
For the state, William A. Wachenfeld and Anthony M. Hauck, Jr.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.