Opinion
No. 91954–2.
2015-11-4
STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Isidro LICON, Petitioner.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 3, 2015, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b). The Department unanimously agreed that the superior court in imposing discretionary legal financial obligations on Mr. Licon in connection with his criminal conviction did not adequately address Mr. Licon's present and future ability to pay based on consideration of his financial resources and the nature of the burden that the payment of discretionary costs would impose, as required by RCW 10.01.160(3) and this court's decision in State of Washington v. Nicholas Peter Blazina, 182 Wash.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015). Pursuant to that decision, the superior court must conduct on the record an individualized inquiry into Mr. Licon's current and future ability to pay in light of such nonexclusive factors as the circumstances of his incarceration and his other debts, including nondiscretionary legal financial obligations, and the factors for determining indigency status under GR 34. Accordingly,
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of imposition of discretionary legal financial obligations and the case is remanded to the Superior Court to reconsider the imposition of 91954–2 the discretionary legal financial obligations consistent with the requirements of State of Washington v. Nicholas Peter Blazina, 182 Wash.2d 827, 344 P.3d 680 (2015).
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J.
CHIEF JUSTICE