This has been held sufficient in numerous cases in our courts. State v. Morano, 134 N.J.L. 295 ( E. A. 1946); Linden Park Blood Horse Association v. State, 55 N.J.L. 557 ( E. A. 1893); State v. Schmid, 57 N.J.L. 625 ( Sup. Ct. 1895); State v. Spear, 63 N.J.L. 179 ( Sup. Ct. 1899); State v. Caporale, 85 N.J.L. 495 ( Sup. Ct. 1914); State v. Morris, 98 N.J.L. 621 ( Sup. Ct. 1923), affirmed 99 N.J.L. 526 ( E. A. 1923); Levine v. State, 110 N.J.L. 467 ( E. A. 1933); State v. Tuzenew, 15 N.J. Misc. 584 ( Sup. Ct. 1937), affirmed sub nomine State v. Suckow, 120 N.J.L. 190 ( E. A. 1938); State v. Lewandowski, 121 N.J.L. 612 ( Sup. Ct. 1939); State v. Lisena, 131 N.J.L. 48 ( Sup. Ct. 1943). It further meets the requirements of the aforementioned rule.