Opinion
A22-0570
09-27-2023
ORDER ON PETITION FOR FURTHER REVIEW
Issue Granted:
Did the District Court plainly err in finding good cause had been shown to permit Letourneau to be brought to trial outside the time permitted under Minnesota's Detainer Act (UMDDA), where the Court erroneously determined the date by which trial had to begin, the State had not established good cause for trial to begin beyond the correct date, let alone the Court's erroneously-determined later date, and that Letourneau would have remained in custody during the time preceding the trial's start date?
Granted