From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Leblanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 29, 1926
160 La. 1053 (La. 1926)

Summary

In State v. Leblanc, 160 La. 1053, 108 So. 87 (1926), the supreme court noted that "the defendant has no right of appeal except from a conviction and sentence."

Summary of this case from State v. Townley

Opinion

No. 27820.

March 29, 1926.

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberia; James D. Simon, Judge.

Rex LeBlanc was prosecuted for an offense. From an order granting his motion for continuance, the State appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen. (E. Vuillemot, Dist. Atty., of New Iberia, and E.R. Schowalter, Asst. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

C. Arthur Provost, of New Iberia, for appellee.


The state of Louisiana has appealed from an order granting defendant's motion for a continuance. In criminal cases, the state has no right of appeal except from a final judgment, such as a judgment sustaining a motion to quash or a motion in arrest of judgment, and the defendant has no right of appeal except from a conviction and sentence.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Leblanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 29, 1926
160 La. 1053 (La. 1926)

In State v. Leblanc, 160 La. 1053, 108 So. 87 (1926), the supreme court noted that "the defendant has no right of appeal except from a conviction and sentence."

Summary of this case from State v. Townley
Case details for

State v. Leblanc

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. LEBLANC

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 29, 1926

Citations

160 La. 1053 (La. 1926)
108 So. 87

Citing Cases

State v. Vaughn

The Editor's comment (c) to La. C.Cr.P. art. 912 states in part: "The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled that…

State v. Townley

Furthermore, following Gani, the supreme court continued to recognize the clear distinction between…