From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. LeBlanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 15, 2006
937 So. 2d 844 (La. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-KP-0169.

September 15, 2006.

Appeal from the Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. A, Nos. 101 and 721.


Writ granted. The judgment of the trial court vacating relator's guilty plea is reversed and his conviction and sentence are reinstated. Relator's filing below, properly considered as an application for post-conviction relief, see State v. Tran, 00-2471 (La. 6/1/01), 793 So.2d 193, was untimely and should not have been considered on the merits by the trial court. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330, pp. 21-22 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189, 1201-02. Moreover, relator's unsubstantiated allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel, in the face of plea negotiations which resulted in the reduction of the charge from second degree murder to manslaughter and a 20-year recommended sentence, do not carry his burden of showing that he pled guilty involuntarily. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. Instead, the circumstances in the record reflect a knowing and voluntary waiver of relator's rights and compliance with the constitutional requirements of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).


Summaries of

State v. LeBlanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 15, 2006
937 So. 2d 844 (La. 2006)
Case details for

State v. LeBlanc

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Freddie LeBLANC

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 15, 2006

Citations

937 So. 2d 844 (La. 2006)

Citing Cases

Woodfox v. Cain

The Louisiana Supreme Court has cited article 930.2 in other cases when a petitioner failed to carry his…

State v. Thompson

If an application for postconviction relief is untimely under Article 930.8, it should not be considered on…