Opinion
WD 84757
11-22-2022
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dan R. LAWRENCE, Appellant.
Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent. Carol D. Jansen, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Carol D. Jansen, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
Order
Per Curiam:
Dan Lawrence appeals, following a jury trial, convictions of four counts of third-degree child molestation, § 566.069, and one count of sexual misconduct, § 566.083, for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of seven years on each count of child molestation and a concurrent term of four years on the sexual misconduct count for an aggregate sentence of twenty-eight years’ imprisonment. Lawrence raises two points on appeal. He argues that the State failed to timely disclose alleged impeachment evidence related to two of the State's witnesses, resulting in (1) a due process violation under Giglio v. United States , 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972) ; and (2) a discovery violation under Rule 25.03(g). Because the evidence was not material and there was no prejudice, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).