State v. Law

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Guerro

    2021 UT App. 136 (Utah Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 13 times

    ¶48 Because the DNA report is not a part of the record, and because Guerro has not sought remand to the trial court under rule 23B to provide for its consideration, we determine that he has not carried his burden of proof to show that Counsel rendered ineffective assistance with respect to not calling a witness to testify about the report. See State v. Law, 2003 UT App 228, ¶ 2, 75 P.3d 923 ("Because the [d]efendant attempts to introduce evidence on appeal not contained within the record, we cannot consider this issue on appeal.").

  2. State v. Cline

    397 P.3d 675 (Utah Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 1 times

    Generally, a ... sentence should be overturned only when it is inherently unfair or clearly excessive." State v. Law , 2003 UT App 228, ¶ 5, 75 P.3d 923 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).¶8 Defendant argues that while "some jail time and probation" would have been appropriate, the decision to impose 180 days of jail followed by 24 months of probation was not supported by the record.

  3. State v. Stephenson

    2004 UT App. 145 (Utah Ct. App. 2004)

    Judge Harding's rulings were entirely reasonable and appropriate based on the evidence, law, and arguments of the parties. Thus, because "there is nothing in the record suggesting Judge Harding was under the influence of any drug during any of Defendant's proceedings and, . . . [Defendant] cannot show if or how Judge Harding, by reason of drug use, abused his discretion . . . [or demonstrate] how Defendant's due process rights were violated," State v. Law, 2003 UT App 228, ¶ 3, 75 P.3d 923 (mem.), Defendant's due process claim fails. Defendant also asserts a variety of other claims on appeal that are unsupported by any legal authority, analysis, or record citations.