From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Laurence

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 30, 2015
127 A.3d 185 (Conn. 2015)

Opinion

11-30-2015

STATE of Connecticut v. Laurence V. PARNOFF.

Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Norman A. Pattis, New Haven, in opposition.


Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Norman A. Pattis, New Haven, in opposition.

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 160 Conn.App. 270, 125 A.3d 573 (2015), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly determine in its de novo review of the record, that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction for disorderly conduct pursuant to General Statutes § 53a–182 (a)(1) because the state's proof of that offense's threat element did not satisfy the first amendment's ‘fighting words' doctrine?”


Summaries of

State v. Laurence

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 30, 2015
127 A.3d 185 (Conn. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Laurence

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Laurence V. PARNOFF.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 30, 2015

Citations

127 A.3d 185 (Conn. 2015)
320 Conn. 901