From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2007
44 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1733.

October 18, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered May 6, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Carl S. Kaplan of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Frank Glaser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Gonzalez, Sweeny, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.


After conducting a hearing, the court properly denied defendant's CPL 330.30 (2) motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct. Under all the circumstances of the case, the weather information that a juror improperly collected from the Internet was immaterial, and did not create a substantial risk of prejudice ( see People v Maragh, 94 NY2d 569, 574). Likewise, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request that additional jurors be brought back to court for testimony at the hearing.


Summaries of

People v. Lara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 2007
44 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Lara

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. MIGUEL LARA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7877
843 N.Y.S.2d 311

Citing Cases

People v. Auguste

guilty verdict, the particular facts of each case must be examined, because “not every misstep by a juror…