From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lanier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2007
44 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Summary

holding that the victim's pain from dental injuries that continued over one year after the assault constituted protracted impairment of health

Summary of this case from Hiraeta v. New York

Opinion

No. 1825.

October 25, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael A. Gross, J.), rendered October 21, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jean Soo Park of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility ( see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The element of serious physical injury (Penal Law § 10.00) was established by evidence that the victim's dental injuries caused a protracted impairment of his health, or of the function of a bodily organ. The injury caused pain, and difficulty in eating, for an extended period of time, and this impairment was still present at the time of the trial, over a year after the crime ( see People v Hall, 89 AD2d 788). The evidence also supported the conclusion that defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to the victim, which was the natural consequence of his conduct ( see People v Getch, 50 NY2d 456, 465; People v Caban, 306 AD2d 141, Iv denied 100 NY2d 618). The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant struck the victim a hard blow in the face with a metal object. Moreover, the surrounding circumstances demonstrated that defendant had a motive to seriously injure the victim, and had actually threatened to do so.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.


Summaries of

State v. Lanier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 25, 2007
44 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

holding that the victim's pain from dental injuries that continued over one year after the assault constituted protracted impairment of health

Summary of this case from Hiraeta v. New York
Case details for

State v. Lanier

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES LANIER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 25, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 8003
843 N.Y.S.2d 629

Citing Cases

People v. Melendez

" ‘A jury is entitled to infer that a defendant intended the natural and probable consequences of his acts’ "…

Hiraeta v. New York

In addition, New York courts have also held that injuries that continued to cause the victim pain for over…