From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Langer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 19, 1986
490 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-879.

June 19, 1986.

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County, Richard F. Conrad, J.

Mart Troum, Asst. State Atty., Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


The State of Florida seeks to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of this district court of appeal to review a county court order denying a motion in limine made by the State to exclude from evidence at trial the opinion of a certain defense expert witness which order was certified by the county court to be of great public importance.

The testimony of a defense expert witness is not a "confession" nor an "admission" nor is it "evidence obtained by search and seizure." Therefore a non-final order denying a state's motion in limine to exclude the opinion testimony of a proposed defense expert witness is not appealable by the State under Rule 9.140(c)(1)(B) nor any other provision of that rule. The jurisdiction of district courts of appeal to discretionarily review by appeal non-final orders of the county court is limited by Rule 9.030(b)(4)(B) to orders otherwise appealable to the circuit court under Rule 9.140(c). Because the order in question is not appealable to the circuit court under rule 9.140(c) this court does not have jurisdiction to review that order under Rule 9.030(b)(4)(B).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Langer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 19, 1986
490 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Langer

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ERIC G. LANGER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 19, 1986

Citations

490 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Richardson

Pursuant to rule 9.140(c)(1)(B), we conclude that the state may appeal the trial court's order to the extent…

STATE v. BREA

The order may not therefore be considered such an admission as a matter of the law of appellate review. See…