From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lampe

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .
Feb 24, 2015
456 S.W.3d 79 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 100995

02-24-2015

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph Lampe, Appellant.

Matthew W. Huckeby, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Matthew W. Huckeby, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Lampe (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of four counts of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and admitting at trial evidence obtained during an unlawful search and seizure.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Lampe

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .
Feb 24, 2015
456 S.W.3d 79 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Lampe

Case Details

Full title:State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph Lampe, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .

Date published: Feb 24, 2015

Citations

456 S.W.3d 79 (E.D. Mo. 2015)