From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Laird

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jun 9, 2021
312 Or. App. 263 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A170577

06-09-2021

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary Duane LAIRD, Defendant-Appellant.

Ryan T. O'Connor and O'Connor Weber LLC filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Ryan T. O'Connor and O'Connor Weber LLC filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM In this criminal case, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of strangulation constituting domestic violence, ORS 163.187 ; unlawful use of a weapon with a firearm, ORS 166.220 ; second-degree assault constituting domestic violence, ORS 163.175 ; and fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence, ORS 163.160. The trial court imposed an aggregate prison sentence of 130 months consecutive to a previously imposed sentence arising out of a case in Clackamas County Circuit Court. More specifically, as part of that 130-month aggregate sentence, the court imposed a five-year gun-minimum sentence under ORS 161.610 on the unlawful use of a weapon-firearm conviction.

On appeal, defendant raises eight assignments of error, and we reject all but one of those assignments without discussion. In his eighth assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court plainly erred when it imposed a five-year gun minimum under ORS 161.610. Recognizing that defendant previously was convicted of a qualifying felony in Clackamas County, the state concedes that the trial court plainly erred in imposing a second gun-minimum sentence. We agree, accept the state's concession, and exercise our discretion to correct the error. See State v. Wells , 82 Or. App. 283, 286, 728 P.2d 533 (1986) (explaining that, under a prior version of ORS 161.610, the trial court "had no authority to impose a second five-year minimum sentence" in Marion County after the defendant had already received a five-year gun-minimum sentence in Polk County); see also State v. Birchard , 105 Or. App. 400, 401, 804 P.2d 1224, rev. den. , 311 Or. 427, 812 P.2d 826 (1991) (holding that the trial court plainly erred by imposing a gun-minimum sentence in violation of ORS 161.610 and exercising discretion to correct it).

ORS 161.610 provides, in part:

"(4) The minimum terms of imprisonment for felonies having as an element the defendant's use or threatened use of a firearm in the commission of the crime shall be as follows:

"(a) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, upon the first conviction for such felony , five years, except that if the firearm is a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun or is equipped with a firearms silencer, the term of imprisonment shall be 10 years."

(Emphasis added.)

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Laird

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jun 9, 2021
312 Or. App. 263 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Laird

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GARY DUANE LAIRD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

312 Or. App. 263 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
487 P.3d 878

Citing Cases

State v. Laird

11-24-2021 State v. Laird, Gary Duane (A170577) (312 Or.App. 263). PETITION FOR REVIEW…

State v. Laird

Affirmed. State v. Laird, 312 Or.App. 263, 487 P.3d 878 (2021); State v. Laird, 300 Or.App. 403, 450 P.3d…