From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kyle A.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 7, 2022
343 Conn. 930 (Conn. 2022)

Opinion

06-07-2022

STATE of Connecticut v. KYLE A.

Julia K. Conlin, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Rocco A. Chiarenza, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Julia K. Conlin, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Rocco A. Chiarenza, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 212 Conn. App. 239, 274 A.3d 896 (2022), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court's instruction on burglary in the first degree was not reversible error under the plain error doctrine?"

ROBINSON, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Kyle A.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 7, 2022
343 Conn. 930 (Conn. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Kyle A.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. KYLE A.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

343 Conn. 930 (Conn. 2022)
281 A.3d 1187

Citing Cases

State v. Kyle A.

We granted certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court correctly…