Summary
In State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App. 1993), the appeal was dismissed for similar, albeit fewer, Rule 84.04 violations as exist here.
Summary of this case from Burton v. TuckerOpinion
No. 64360.
December 21, 1993.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, GARY D. LEWIS AND ROY L. RICHTER, JJ.
Bruce Woodruff Kurt, pro se.
Robert P. McCulloch, Pros. Atty., St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and SIMON and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
Appellant, Bruce Woodruff Kurt, appeals from his misdemeanor conviction of driving while his license was suspended, entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to one year imprisonment in the county jail and a $50.00 fine. We dismiss the appeal.
Appellant originally filed his appeal with the Missouri Supreme Court. The appeal was transferred to this court where proper jurisdiction was vested.
Our review of appellant's brief establishes an abundance of egregious violations of Rule 84.04(a), (c), (d), and (e). Appellant fails to include Points Relied On, fails to include a list of authorities, and fails to provide "a fair and concise statement of facts" as required by Rule 84.04. We find that appellant has preserved nothing for this court to review. See Jones v. Jones, 819 S.W.2d 773, 774 (Mo.App., E.D. 1991); Wehmeyer v. Bassett Realty, Inc., 840 S.W.2d 290, 291 (Mo.App., S.D. 1992). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.