From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. KRUG

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County
Jun 26, 1998
No. L-97-1398 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 26, 1998)

Opinion

No. L-97-1398.

Decided: June 26, 1998.

Appeal from the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, Trial Court Nos. CR81-5946, CR82-5047, CR82-5507, CR82-5511, CR87-6702, CR87-7197.

Julia R. Bates, prosecuting attorney, and Eric A. Baum, for appellee.

Davetti Krug, pro se.


OPINION


Prior to July 1, 1996, appellant, Davetti Krug, was convicted of various offenses. In 1997, he moved the trial court for resentencing under the provisions of Am.Sub.S.B. 2, now codified in R.C. 2951.011 et seq. The trial court denied appellant's motion. He now appeals that decision, arguing, in his sole assignment of error, that his constitutional rights were violated by being excluded from the new sentencing structure.

The provisions of R.C. 2951.011 et seq. are not to be applied retroactively. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 186, 187-188; State v. Lee (Mar. 31, 1998), Erie App. No. E-97-109, unreported; State v. Rayford (Jan. 30, 1998), Lucas App. No. L-97-1245, unreported. Since appellant's offenses were all committed prior to July 1, 1996, the new sentencing provisions of R.C. 2951.011 et seq. do not apply to appellant.

Accordingly, appellant's sole assignment of error is not well-taken.

The judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Court costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Peter M. Handwork, P.J. George M. Glasser, J. James R. Sherck, J.

CONCUR.


Summaries of

STATE v. KRUG

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County
Jun 26, 1998
No. L-97-1398 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 26, 1998)
Case details for

STATE v. KRUG

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Davetti Krug, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County

Date published: Jun 26, 1998

Citations

No. L-97-1398 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 26, 1998)