From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Koprowski

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville
Dec 16, 1997
C.C.A. No. 03C01-9605-CR-00197 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 16, 1997)

Opinion

C.C.A. No. 03C01-9605-CR-00197.

December 16, 1997.

ANDERSON COUNTY, HON. JAMES B. SCOTT, JUDGE, (Post Conviction).

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

FOR THE APPELLANT:

DOUGLAS A. TRANT

FOR THE APPELLEE:

JOHN KNOX WALKUP, Attorney General and Reporter, ROBIN L. HARRIS, Assistant Attorney General, JAMES N. RAMSEY, District Attorney General, JAN HICKS, Assistant District Attorney.


OPINION FILED: ________________________


ORDER

In this appeal of the summary dismissal of his post-conviction petition Appellant, Stephen Koprowski, asks this Court to review the validity of the dismissal of his post-conviction petition filed on April 26, 1996. On April 28, 1992, Appellant pleaded guilty to simple possession of marijuana. He was sentenced to 11 months and 29 days. Appellant alleges that he was not fully advised of his rights as set out in Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure. In addition, Appellant alleges that he was not advised of his rights against self-incrimination, to confront witnesses and to a jury trial. On December 15, 1995, the Appellant's sentence was enhanced in the United States District Court, and Appellant now seeks post-conviction relief as to the alleged constitutionally invalid guilty plea.

Although acknowledging his post-conviction petition was time-barred under the three year statute of limitations in effect when his conviction became final, Appellant argues that the enactment on May 10, 1995, of the new one year statute of limitations for post-conviction petitions creates an additional one year period in which he may file for post-conviction relief. Our State Supreme Court has only recently resolved this issue adversely to Appellant's position. Carter v. State, No. 03-S-01-9612-CR-00117, Monroe County (Tenn., Knoxville, Sept. 8, 1997,). Thus the petition for post-conviction relief was properly dismissed.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

____________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

___________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE

___________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE


Summaries of

State v. Koprowski

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville
Dec 16, 1997
C.C.A. No. 03C01-9605-CR-00197 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 16, 1997)
Case details for

State v. Koprowski

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee, v. STEPHEN KOPROWSKI, Appellant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville

Date published: Dec 16, 1997

Citations

C.C.A. No. 03C01-9605-CR-00197 (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 16, 1997)