From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kloss

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN SUPREME COURT
Mar 6, 2020
2020 WI 26 (Wis. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2018AP651-CR

03-06-2020

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, v. Kelly James KLOSS, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

For the plaintiff-respondent-cross petitioner, there were briefs filed by Lisa E.F. Kumfer, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Lisa E.F. Kumfer. For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Steven L. Miller and Miller Appellate Practice, LLC, River Falls. There was an oral argument by Steven L. Miller.


For the plaintiff-respondent-cross petitioner, there were briefs filed by Lisa E.F. Kumfer, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Lisa E.F. Kumfer.

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Steven L. Miller and Miller Appellate Practice, LLC, River Falls. There was an oral argument by Steven L. Miller.

PER CURIAM. ¶1 Kelly Kloss and the State cross-petitioned for review of the decision of the court of appeals, State v. Kloss, 2019 WI App 13, 386 Wis. 2d 314, 925 N.W.2d 563. After reviewing the record and the briefs of both parties, and after hearing oral arguments, we conclude this matter should be dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶2 By the Court. —The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶3 REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY and DANIEL KELLY, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

State v. Kloss

STATE OF WISCONSIN IN SUPREME COURT
Mar 6, 2020
2020 WI 26 (Wis. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Kloss

Case Details

Full title:State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, v. Kelly James…

Court:STATE OF WISCONSIN IN SUPREME COURT

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

2020 WI 26 (Wis. 2020)
2020 WI 26
939 N.W.2d 564

Citing Cases

State v. Jackson

The dissent states: For examples of dismissals without explanation, see Slamka[ v. Gen. Heating and Air…

Slamka v. Gen. Heating & Air Conditioning

An examination of such dismissals in recent years reveals a largely inconsistent practice with regard to…