From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. KLIE

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 27, 2007
116 Haw. 519 (Haw. 2007)

Summary

holding that the district court disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of the defendant by denying defendant's motion for a deferred acceptance of no contest based on erroneous statutory interpretation

Summary of this case from State v. Lora

Opinion

No. 27992.

December 27, 2007.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Moon, C.J.

Scot Stuart Brower, for petitioner/defendant-appellant, on the application.

Daniel H. Shimizu, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent/plaintiff-appellee.

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, and DUFFY, JJ.


Summaries of

STATE v. KLIE

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Dec 27, 2007
116 Haw. 519 (Haw. 2007)

holding that the district court disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of the defendant by denying defendant's motion for a deferred acceptance of no contest based on erroneous statutory interpretation

Summary of this case from State v. Lora
Case details for

STATE v. KLIE

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Hawai'i, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas E. KLIE…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Dec 27, 2007

Citations

116 Haw. 519 (Haw. 2007)
174 P.3d 358

Citing Cases

Kewalo Ocean Activities v. Ching

KOA contends the circuit court erred in granting the State's MSJ because based on the clear and unambiguous…

State v. Satoafaiga

State v. Davia, 87 Hawai‘i 249, 253, 953 P.2d 1347, 1351 (1998) (internal quotation marks and citation…