From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Klein

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
May 6, 2014
Docket No. 41609 (Idaho Ct. App. May. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Docket No. 41609 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 494

05-06-2014

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JESSE JAMES KLEIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk


THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jesse James Klein pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen. I.C. § 18-1508. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Klein to a unified term of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Klein appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Klein's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Klein

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
May 6, 2014
Docket No. 41609 (Idaho Ct. App. May. 6, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JESSE JAMES KLEIN…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: May 6, 2014

Citations

Docket No. 41609 (Idaho Ct. App. May. 6, 2014)