From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. King

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1947
51 A.2d 365 (N.J. 1947)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1946 —

Decided February 3, 1947.

On writ of error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 133 N.J.L. 480.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

For the plaintiff in error, Walter S. Keown and Raymond L. Siris.

For the defendant in error, Gene R. Mariano and Anthony C. Mitchell.


The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, JJ. 6.

For reversal — BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, WACHENFELD, McGEEHAN, McLEAN, JJ. 6.


Summaries of

State v. King

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1947
51 A.2d 365 (N.J. 1947)
Case details for

State v. King

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HAZEL E. KING, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 3, 1947

Citations

51 A.2d 365 (N.J. 1947)
51 A.2d 365

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

State v. Danser, 116 N.J.L. 487, 492 ( E. A. 1936). In State v. King, 133 N.J.L. 480 ( Sup. Ct. 1945), at p.…

State v. Sudol

Upon an indictment for abortion made under N.J.S. 2 A:87-1, it is incumbent on the State to establish that…