From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Dec 5, 2000
31 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED75257.

January 11, 2000. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 4, 2000 Application for Transfer Denied December 5, 2000

Appeal from Missouri Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Anna C. Forder, Judge.

RAYMUND J. CAPELOVITCH, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, Attorney General, GREGORY L. BARNES, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Kent E. Karohl, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J. concurring.



ORDER


Cleophus King (appellant) appeals convictions of felonious restraint, pursuant to Section 565.120 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties. The evidence, particularly the victim's testimony, supports the findings of the jury and the judgment. There is no evidence to support a finding that the sentence is manifestly unjust or that a miscarriage of justice results from it. Thus, there is no plain error. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Dec 5, 2000
31 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

State v. King

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT v. CLEOPHUS KING, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Dec 5, 2000

Citations

31 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)