From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. King

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 1, 2008
119 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-1131.

October 1, 2008.

Miami App. No. 08-CA-02, 2008-Ohio-2594.


APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

Discretionary appeal accepted.

Motion to consolidate this cause with 2008-0754, State ex rel. King v. Welbaum, Miami App. No. 2008-CA-1, granted.

Briefing in this cause and 2008-0754 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac. R. VI and include both case numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac. R. VI.

Sua sponte, this cause and 2008-0754 shall be consolidated for oral argument with 2008-0991 and 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Rogers, Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040. Appellants in these causes collectively will share 20 minutes for oral argument, as will appellees.

The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Miami County.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal but hold the cause for the decision in 2008-0991 and 2008-0992 and deny the motion to consolidate.


Summaries of

State v. King

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 1, 2008
119 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008)
Case details for

State v. King

Case Details

Full title:State v. King

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 1, 2008

Citations

119 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008)
2008 Ohio 4911

Citing Cases

Walton v. State

The trial court did not appoint counsel to represent appellee. See, State v. King, 119 Ohio St.3d 1471, 894…

Stewart v. State

The trial court overruled appellee's motion to appoint counsel by Judgment Entry filed February 6, 2008.…