From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kidd

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 12, 1983
656 P.2d 391 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. C 82-06-35822, CA A25369

Argued and submitted December 16, 1982

Affirmed January 12, 1983

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Joseph F. Ceniceros, Judge Pro Tempore.

Kim Jefferies, Certified Law Student, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Emily Simon, Supervising Attorney, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


The objections which defendant now raises to a condition of probation imposed by the trial judge were not raised in the trial court. They will not be considered for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Kidd

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 12, 1983
656 P.2d 391 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Kidd

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOANNA LEE KIDD, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 12, 1983

Citations

656 P.2d 391 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
656 P.2d 391

Citing Cases

State v. Mortimore

Defendant raises objections to conditions of probation imposed by the trial court. Assuming that those…

State v. Gilbertson

Defendant filed a motion to modify the conditions in the trial court, which was denied. Accordingly, we may…