Opinion
1 CA-CR 21-0579 PRPC
11-01-2022
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. MATTHEW GARY KEYSER, Petitioner.
Navajo County Attorney's Office, Holbrook By Bradley W. Carlyon Counsel for Respondent Matthew Gary Keyser, Florence Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Navajo County No. S0900CR201600490 The Honorable Dale P. Nielson, Judge
Navajo County Attorney's Office, Holbrook By Bradley W. Carlyon Counsel for Respondent
Matthew Gary Keyser, Florence Petitioner
Presiding Judge David D. Weinzweig, Judge Brian Y. Furuya and Judge Jennifer M. Perkins delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM
¶1 Petitioner Keyser seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner's second petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.