From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ketterer

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 18, 2007
113 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2007)

Opinion

No. 2004-0485.

April 18, 2007.

Butler C.P. No. CR2003-03-0309.


Motion and Procedural Rulings

On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac. R. XI(6). Application granted with respect to Proposition of Law No. VI — whether appellate counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge the appellant's noncapital sentences as a violation of Blakely v. Washington (2004), 542 U.S. 296, and State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470. Judgment vacated as to the noncapital sentences only. In accordance with S.Ct.Prac. R. XI(6)(I), cause remanded to the trial court for resentencing on the noncapital offenses in accordance with State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

LANZINGER, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State v. Ketterer

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 18, 2007
113 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2007)
Case details for

State v. Ketterer

Case Details

Full title:State v. Ketterer

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 18, 2007

Citations

113 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2007)
2007 Ohio 1722

Citing Cases

SCOTT v. HOUK

These methods, created by the legislature, are clear in their application to death-penalty defendants. See…

Gapen v. Bobby

These methods, created by the legislature, are clear in their application to death-penalty defendants. See…