State v. Ketlinski

Full title: STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TAYLOR JOHN KETLINSKI…

Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Oct 25, 2016

Docket No. 43859 (Idaho Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 43859 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 745

10-25-2016

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TAYLOR JOHN KETLINSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Timothy L. Hansen, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for burglary, affirmed. Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Taylor John Ketlinski was found guilty of burglary, Idaho Code § 18-1401, and malicious injury to property, I.C. § 18-7001(1). The district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for the burglary charge and 180 days for the malicious injury to property charge. Ketlinski appeals, contending that his burglary sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ketlinski's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.