From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kennell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 2, 1996
919 S.W.2d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 68065.

April 2, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; HON. THOMAS F. McGUIRE.

Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.


Defendant appeals conviction and sentence on two charges of possession of a controlled substance, one was heroin, the other cocaine. The court imposed a ten year sentence to be served consecutively with a two year sentence. The sufficiency of the evidence is not at issue.

Defendant's only claim of error is the court failed to quash two of the state's preemptory strikes because the explanations for striking two venirepersons were pretextual. After defendant made a timely motion the prosecutor offered race neutral explanations accepted by the court for both venirepersons. Defendant made no effort to demonstrate in what manner the prosecutor's explanations were pretextual. Thus, defendant failed to meet his burden to "show that the prosecutor's proffered reasons are merely pretextual and that the true motivation for the strike was racial." State v. Parker, 836 S.W.2d 930, 934 (Mo. banc 1992). Accordingly, this claim of error fails. Moreover, we have examined the prosecutor's explanations and find they are supported by the voir dire proceeding.

We affirm.

REINHARD, P.J., and GRIMM, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Kennell

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 2, 1996
919 S.W.2d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Kennell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. RONALD KENNELL APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 2, 1996

Citations

919 S.W.2d 282 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)