State v. Kelly

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Michael Kelly, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-412 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-412

08-29-2011

The State, Respondent, v. Michael Kelly, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and William B. Rogers, Jr., of Bennettsville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Chesterfield County

George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and William B. Rogers, Jr., of Bennettsville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Michael Kelly appeals his convictions for incest, lewd act on a minor, and second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor, arguing the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. Additionally, Kelly filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF and PIEPER, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.