From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kalil

Supreme Court of Arizona
May 21, 1959
339 P.2d 396 (Ariz. 1959)

Opinion

No. 6872.

May 21, 1959.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Warren L. McCarthy, J.

Charles C. Stidham, Maricopa County Atty., by Donald D. Meyers, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for appellant.

Struckmeyer, Whitney Perry, by Harold E. Whitney and Sidney L. Kain, Phoenix, for intervenor-appellant; Harry Stewart, Jr., Johnston Gillenwater, Phoenix, of counsel.

Lewis, Roca, Scoville, Beauchamp Linton, by John P. Frank, Phoenix, for appellee.


The sole question presented by this appeal is whether A.R.S. § 11-213, as amended by the 1959 Legislature, is constitutional, i.e., may the Legislature validly empower the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, an appointive statutory official — rather than the County Recorder or some other elected official — to cast a vote in filling a vacancy on that Board? It is our unanimous considered opinion that it can. Inasmuch as we perceive no express or implied constitutional impediment to this enactment, we hold the Legislature had plenary power to make such changes as it saw fit. The wisdom of their action is no concern of this court.

Arlo Gooch, the intervenor-appellant, has no standing before us and his appeal is therefore dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

STRUCKMEYER, J., disqualified.


Summaries of

State v. Kalil

Supreme Court of Arizona
May 21, 1959
339 P.2d 396 (Ariz. 1959)
Case details for

State v. Kalil

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Arizona ex rel. Charles C. STIDHAM, Maricopa County Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: May 21, 1959

Citations

339 P.2d 396 (Ariz. 1959)
339 P.2d 396

Citing Cases

Williams-Carter v. Maricopa County

See A.R.S. § 11-401. The clerk is "an appointive statutory official," State ex rel. Stidham v. Kalil, 85…