From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kaisershot

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Feb 10, 2021
309 Or. App. 322 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A168606 (Control) A168607

02-10-2021

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nickolas John KAISERSHOT, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Christopher Page, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Christopher Page, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.

PER CURIAM In one of these consolidated cases, defendant was convicted by jury of assaulting a public safety officer, second-degree escape, resisting arrest, and driving while suspended. The jury was instructed that it need not reach unanimous verdicts, but was not polled. In the other consolidated case, defendant pleaded no contest to first-degree failure to appear. He makes no argument on appeal concerning the failure to appear case. As for the case tried to a jury, he raises several issues with respect to the trial and the judgment, including an argument that the trial court plainly erred in instructing the jury that it need not reach unanimous verdicts. We reject without discussion all of defendant's arguments concerning the trial and the judgment except his argument that the court plainly erred in instructing the jury that it need not reach unanimous verdicts. Defendant contends that because of the erroneous jury instruction, all verdicts must be reversed in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020). We reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v. Flores Ramos , 367 Or. 292, 478 P.3d 515 (2020) and State v. Dilallo , 367 Or. 340, 478 P.3d 509 (2020).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Kaisershot

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Feb 10, 2021
309 Or. App. 322 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Kaisershot

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NICKOLAS JOHN KAISERSHOT…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 10, 2021

Citations

309 Or. App. 322 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
309 Or. App. 322