From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kafka

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 18, 2015
362 P.3d 1124 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

relying on Howell to conclude that K.S.A. 22-3504 not proper vehicle for challenging failure to impose intermediate sanction

Summary of this case from State v. McCroy

Opinion

111,937 111,938 112,021.

12-18-2015

STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Robert KAFKA, Appellant.

Corrine E. Gunning, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Michael Gayoso, Jr., county attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.


Decision Without Published Opinion

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Kafka

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Dec 18, 2015
362 P.3d 1124 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

relying on Howell to conclude that K.S.A. 22-3504 not proper vehicle for challenging failure to impose intermediate sanction

Summary of this case from State v. McCroy
Case details for

State v. Kafka

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Robert KAFKA, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Dec 18, 2015

Citations

362 P.3d 1124 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. McCroy

Several other panels have likewise concluded that claims alleging error related to the graduated sentencing…

State v. King

See State v. Brown , No. 114,212, 2016 WL 4259938, at *1 (Kan. App. 2016) (unpublished opinion) (failure to…