From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. K. D. (In re K. D.)

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Oct 22, 2014
A156376 (Or. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2014)

Opinion

A156376

10-22-2014

In the Matter of K. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. K. D., Appellant.


Coos County Circuit Court
6309
Richard L. Barron, Judge.

Submitted on September 05, 2014. Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Sarah M. Villanueva, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Sercombe, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Judge, and Tookey, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed.

DESIGNATION OF PREVAILING PARTY AND AWARD OF COSTS

Prevailing party: Appellant [ ] No costs allowed.
[ ] Costs allowed, payable by
[ ] Costs allowed, to abide the outcome on remand, payable by

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. She asserts that "there is not clear and convincing evidence in the record that she was mentally ill as defined under ORS 426.005(1)(e)(C)" and that the trial court erred in concluding that she "was mentally ill as defined under" that provision. The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the court's judgment committing appellant, pursuant to ORS 426.005(1)(e)(C), "as a person with chronic mental illness" and that, accordingly, the trial court's judgment should be reversed. We agree, and accept the state's concession.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. K. D. (In re K. D.)

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Oct 22, 2014
A156376 (Or. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2014)
Case details for

State v. K. D. (In re K. D.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of K. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

A156376 (Or. Ct. App. Oct. 22, 2014)