From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Manville v. Astrab

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Aug 5, 2016
2016 Ohio 5336 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 104246

08-05-2016

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. TODD MANVILLE RELATOR v. JUDGE MICHAEL K. ASTRAB RESPONDENT

FOR RELATOR Todd Manville, pro se Chillicothe Correctional Institution Inmate No. A532-223 P.O. Box 5500 Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Procedendo
Motion No. 495260
Order No. 497747

FOR RELATOR

Todd Manville, pro se
Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Inmate No. A532-223
P.O. Box 5500
Chillicothe, Ohio 45601

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
By: James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
The Justice Center
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113 FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.:

{¶1} Todd Manville, relator, has petitioned this court to issue a writ of procedendo to compel the trial court to rule on his motion to vacate void judgment, filed June 29, 2011, in State v. Manville, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-07-491035-A. Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment. We grant respondent's motion for summary judgment and deny relator's complaint because it is moot.

{¶2} Respondent's motion for summary judgment attached a copy of the trial court's entry that was journalized on March 22, 2016, which demonstrates that a ruling has been rendered with regard to relator's motion. "[R]elief is unwarranted because mandamus and procedendo will not compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed." State ex rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 135 Ohio St.3d 456, 2013-Ohio-1911, 989 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 4. Relator has not opposed the motion for summary judgment.

{¶3} Respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted and relator's complaint for writ of procedendo is denied. Costs are assessed against respondent but are waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied. FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., JUDGE TIM McCORMACK, P.J., and
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State ex rel. Manville v. Astrab

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Aug 5, 2016
2016 Ohio 5336 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

State ex rel. Manville v. Astrab

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. TODD MANVILLE RELATOR v. JUDGE MICHAEL K. ASTRAB…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Aug 5, 2016

Citations

2016 Ohio 5336 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)