From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Judd

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jan 1, 1998
128 N.C. App. 328 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

holding this Court lacked jurisdiction where the State failed to file a certificate as required by N.C.G.S. § 15A–979(c)

Summary of this case from State v. Williams

Opinion

No. COA97-213

Filed 6 January 1998

Appeal and Error § 81 (NCI4th) — motion to suppress cocaine allowed — appeal by State — no certification by prosecutor — dismissed

An appeal by the State from the granting of a motion to suppress fifty-two grams of crack cocaine in a prosecution for cocaine possession and trafficking was dismissed where there was no indication in the record that the prosecutor certified to the trial court that the appeal was not taken to cause delay and that the suppressed evidence was essential to the State's case. N.C.G.S. § 15A-979(c).

Appeal by the State from order filed 2 December 1996 by Judge Wiley F. Bowen in Harnett County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 17 November 1997.

Attorney General Michael F. Easley, by Assistant Attorney General John G. Barnwell, for the State.

R. Allen Lytch, P.A., by R. Allen Lytch and Sheila Stafford Pope, for the defendant appellee.


The State appeals from the trial court's order allowing Stacy Andrew Judd's (defendant) motion to suppress evidence of fifty-two grams of crack cocaine seized from him.

On 14 October 1996, the defendant was indicted for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine by possession and transportation and for trafficking cocaine by possession and transportation. The defendant made a motion to suppress the evidence seized, fifty-two grams of crack cocaine, and contended it was obtained in violation of his rights under the United States Constitution and the North Carolina Constitution. The trial court granted the motion to suppress and the State appealed.

The dispositive issue is whether this Court has jurisdiction over the State's appeal.

"The State may appeal an order by the superior court granting a motion to suppress as provided in G.S. 15A-979." N.C.G.S. § 15A-1445(b) (Supp. 1996). Subsection (c) of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979 provides that a superior court order that grants a motion to suppress is appealable "prior to trial upon certificate by the prosecutor to the judge who granted the motion that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay and that the evidence is essential to the case." N.C.G.S. § 15A-979(c) (1988). The burden is on the State to show that it has the right to appeal and has appealed in accordance with the requirements of the statute. State v. Dobson, 51 N.C. App. 445, 447, 276 S.E.2d 480, 482 (1981).

In this case, there is no indication in the record that the prosecutor certified to the trial court, which granted the motion to suppress, that the appeal was not taken to cause delay and that the suppressed evidence was essential to the State's case. Because the State did not follow the mandate of section 15A-979(c), this Court is without jurisdiction over the appeal. State v. McDonald, 55 N.C. App. 393, 394, 285 S.E.2d 282, 283 (1982).

Dismissed.

Chief Judge ARNOLD and Judge McGEE concur.


Summaries of

State v. Judd

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jan 1, 1998
128 N.C. App. 328 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)

holding this Court lacked jurisdiction where the State failed to file a certificate as required by N.C.G.S. § 15A–979(c)

Summary of this case from State v. Williams

discussing procedure

Summary of this case from State v. McNeill
Case details for

State v. Judd

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. STACY ANDREW JUDD

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 1, 1998

Citations

128 N.C. App. 328 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)
494 S.E.2d 605

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

SeeBlack's Law Dictionary 405 (9th ed.2009) (defining “court” as “[a] governmental body consisting of one or…

State v. Sparks

It is well established that "[a]n order . . . granting a motion to suppress prior to trial is appealable . .…