From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jordan

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 17, 2019
278 So. 3d 961 (La. 2019)

Opinion

No. 2018-KH-2043

09-17-2019

STATE of Louisiana v. Rhonda JORDAN


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that she received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Applicant also fails to show that the state withheld material exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

Applicant has now fully litigated her application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless she can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted her right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.


Summaries of

State v. Jordan

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 17, 2019
278 So. 3d 961 (La. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. RHONDA JORDAN

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 17, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 961 (La. 2019)