From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 3, 2012
305 Conn. 918 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-3

STATE of Connecticut v. Victor L. JORDAN, Sr.

Pamela S. Nagy, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Pamela S. Nagy, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 135 Conn.App. 635, 42 A.3d 457, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the prosecutor's failure to correct the misleading testimony of Herman Cordero and Jennifer Campbell did not deprive the defendant of his due process right to a fair trial?

“2. Should this court overrule its construction of General Statutes § 53a–155 in State v. Foreshaw, 214 Conn. 540, 572 A.2d 1006 (1990)?”


Summaries of

State v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 3, 2012
305 Conn. 918 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Jordan

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Victor L. JORDAN, Sr.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

305 Conn. 918 (Conn. 2012)
47 A.3d 388

Citing Cases

State v. Jordan

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following questions: (1) “Did…

State v. Perez

We are cognizant of the following question certified by our Supreme Court in State v. Jordan, 305 Conn. 918,…