From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jones

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Feb 8, 2019
NO. 2018 KW 1362 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 2018 KW 1362

02-08-2019

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JEREMY JONES


In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 1703035. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., McCLENDON AND HIGGINBOTHAM, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The district court's ruling granting the defendant's motion to recuse is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. In the instant matter, the defendant failed to meet its burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that the district attorney has a personal interest in conflict with the fair and impartial administration of justice. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 680. An appearance of bias and prejudice is not sufficient to warrant the granting of a motion to recuse. In order to show that a district attorney should be recused from a case, the defendant has to prove that he was treated differently in the management of his case. See State v. Battaglia, 2017-1451 (La. 2/14/18), ___ So.3d ___, 2018 WL 851274 (per curiam). Moreover, the recusal of an assistant district attorney does not require the recusal of the district attorney or his/her other assistants. State v. Edwards, 420 So.2d 663, 673 (La. 1982).

VGW

PMc

TMH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Jones

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Feb 8, 2019
NO. 2018 KW 1362 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JEREMY JONES

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 8, 2019

Citations

NO. 2018 KW 1362 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2019)