From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jones

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Sep 7, 1999
97 Wn. App. 1025 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

operating a vehicle with a cracked windshield does not violate the statute prohibiting driving "any motor vehicle with any sign, poster, or other nontransparent material upon the front windshield, side wings, or side or rear windows"

Summary of this case from State v. Bolme

Opinion

No. 43035-1-I.

September 7, 1999. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-02178-7, Charles W. Mertel, J., entered June 18, 1999.


Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Jones

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Sep 7, 1999
97 Wn. App. 1025 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)

operating a vehicle with a cracked windshield does not violate the statute prohibiting driving "any motor vehicle with any sign, poster, or other nontransparent material upon the front windshield, side wings, or side or rear windows"

Summary of this case from State v. Bolme
Case details for

State v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent v. Rickey Lee JONES, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Sep 7, 1999

Citations

97 Wn. App. 1025 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)
97 Wash. App. 1025

Citing Cases

State v. Bolme

However, several other courts have interpreted nearly identical statutes to conclude that a crack is not…