From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 29, 1974
521 P.2d 1316 (Or. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73 1589

Argued April 17, 1974

Affirmed April 29, 1974

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County.

HELEN J. FRYE, Judge.

Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem.

John K. Hoover, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and THORNTON and TANZER, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


The state appeals from an order sustaining defendant's plea of former jeopardy on a charge of criminal activity in drugs based upon defendant's prior plea of guilty to a charge of criminal drug promotion.

On April 8, 1973, a police officer entered a residence in Springfield, Oregon, and arrested a man named Rynearson for criminal activity in drugs. Defendant was present at that time and by reason of this was arrested and charged with criminal drug promotion. Defendant was found to have drugs on his person and was separately charged with the additional crime of criminal activity in drugs.

Defendant, at a time when the prosecutor had all the relevant facts in his possession, pleaded guilty to the charge of criminal drug promotion. The trial judge correctly held that under these circumstances the defendant could not thereafter be prosecuted on the criminal-activity-in-drugs charge. State v. Brown, 262 Or. 442, 497 P.2d 1191 (1972), holds that under Art I, § 12, Oregon Constitution:

"No person shall be put in jeopardy twice for the same offence (sic), nor be compelled in any criminal prosecution to testify against himself." Art I, § 12, Oregon Constitution.

"* * * a second prosecution is for the 'same offense' and is prohibited if (1) the charges arise out of the same act or transaction, and (2) the charges could have been tried in the same court, and (3) the prosecutor knew or reasonably should have known of the facts relevant to the second charge at the time of the original prosecution." 262 Or at 458.

See also, State v. Fitzgerald, 267 Or. 266, 516 P.2d 1280 (1973).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 29, 1974
521 P.2d 1316 (Or. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MICHAEL HARRISON JOHNSON, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 29, 1974

Citations

521 P.2d 1316 (Or. Ct. App. 1974)
521 P.2d 1316

Citing Cases

State v. Burke

He offers no Indiana decisions to support his position but does cite cases from three other jurisdictions as…

State v. Boyd

We do not believe Brown intended it be possible to have two trials in such a situation. Cf., State v.…