From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Aug 4, 1992
833 S.W.2d 49 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 59615, 60757.

August 4, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS; THOMAS C. MUMMERT, III, JUDGE.

John Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.


In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals his conviction of rape and the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. However, defendant's brief does not include any points relied on or argument relating to the denial. Therefore, his appeal of the 29.15 motion is considered abandoned.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Aug 4, 1992
833 S.W.2d 49 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. JUDGE JOHNSON…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Aug 4, 1992

Citations

833 S.W.2d 49 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

State v. Howton

Mr. Howton further appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing,…