Opinion
No. 145-40735-2.
May 18, 1970.
[1] Appeal and Error — Review — Credibility of Witnesses. It is not the function of an appellate court to reevaluate the credibility and weight to be attached to the testimony of witnesses. [See 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error § 883.]
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 48807, Robert F. Utter, J., entered November 22, 1968.
Lockett Johnson and William F. Lockett, for appellant. Charles O. Carroll, Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip Y. Killien, Deputy, for respondent.
Affirmed.
Prosecution for larceny. Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence.
Defendant appeals from the conviction of grand larceny. His sole assignment of error challenges the credibility of the complaining witness. It is not our function to reevaluate the credibility of witnesses. The credibility and weight to be attached to the testimony of witnesses is for the trier of fact and not an appellate court. State v. Hoffman, 64 Wn.2d 445, 392 P.2d 237 (1964); State v. Bunch, 2 Wn. App. 189, 467 P.2d 212 (1970).
Judgment affirmed.