From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Apr 11, 2019
925 N.W.2d 396 (N.D. 2019)

Opinion

No. 20180349

04-11-2019

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Lucas Michael JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant

Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant City Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Yancy B. Cottrill, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant City Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Yancy B. Cottrill, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Lucas Michael Johnson appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he conditionally pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. Johnson argues the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search unsupported by reasonable and articulable suspicion. We conclude there is sufficient competent evidence supporting the district court’s finding of a traffic violation constituting reasonable and articulable suspicion for the stop. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). See State v. Asbach , 2015 ND 280, ¶¶ 11-14, 871 N.W.2d 820.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Apr 11, 2019
925 N.W.2d 396 (N.D. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Lucas Michael Johnson…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Apr 11, 2019

Citations

925 N.W.2d 396 (N.D. 2019)
2019 N.D. 91