From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 3, 1926
211 N.W. 5 (Minn. 1926)

Opinion

No. 25,634.

December 3, 1926.

Appeal of criminal case from justice court properly dismissed because recognizance was not approved by justice.

Appeal from justice court to district court in a criminal case properly dismissed for failure of appellant to procure the approval by the justice of the appeal bond.

Criminal Law, 16 C.J. p. 375 n. 43.

Defendant appealed from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Dickinson, J., dismissing an appeal from the justice court to the district court. Affirmed.

John G. Priebe, for appellant.

Clifford L. Hilton, Attorney General, Floyd B. Olson, County Attorney, and Arthur Markve, Assistant County Attorney, for respondent.



Convicted in justice court of maintaining a nuisance in the nature of a dispensary of intoxicating liquor, defendant attempted to appeal to the district court. He neglected to have his appeal bond approved by the justice. The statute requires in connection with such an appeal "a recognizance, with sufficient surety, to be approved by the justice." G.S. 1923, subd. 1, § 9129. Such a recognizance, so approved, is jurisdictional. This is an appeal from the order of the district court dismissing the attempted appeal from the justice court. For the reason indicated, that order was right and therefore is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Johanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 3, 1926
211 N.W. 5 (Minn. 1926)
Case details for

State v. Johanson

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. GODFRED JOHANSON

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 3, 1926

Citations

211 N.W. 5 (Minn. 1926)
211 N.W. 5

Citing Cases

State v. Johnson

While there are contra authorities, under our statute it is the duty of the defendant to procure the approval…