State v. Jesse S. (In re Zoey S.)

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Leah B. (In re Jordon B.)

    316 Neb. 974 (Neb. 2024)   Cited 3 times

    See, e.g., Maria T. v. Jeremy S., 300 Neb. 563, 915 N.W.2d 441 (2018); Monty S. & Teresa S. v. Jason W. & Rebecca W., 290 Neb. 1048, 863 N.W.2d 484 (2015); Hohndorf v. Watson, 240 Neb. 368, 482 N.W.2d 241 (1992); Yopp v. Batt, 237 Neb. 779, 467 N.W.2d 868 (1991); Hensman v. Parsons, 235 Neb. 872, 458 N.W.2d 199 (1990); D.S. v. United Catholic Soc. Servs., 227 Neb. 654, 419 N.W.2d 531 (1988); Gaughan v. Gilliam, 224 Neb. 836, 401 N.W.2d 687 (1987); Auman v. Toomey, 220 Neb. 70, 368 N.W.2d 459 (1985); Gray v. Maxwell, 206 Neb. 385, 293 N.W.2d 90 (1980); Kane v. United Catholic Social Services, 187 Neb. 467, 191 N.W.2d 824 (1971); Batt v. Nebraska Children's Home Society, 185 Neb. 124, 174 N.W.2d 88 (1970). See, also, In re Interest of Zoey S., 22 Neb.App. 371, 853 N.W.2d 225 (2014). Cf. In re Interest of Jade S., No. A-09-344, 2009 WL 3161633 at *3 (Neb.App. Sept. 29, 2009) (selected for posting to court website) ("[mother's] motion includes allegations that are tantamount to asserting that her relinquishment of parental rights was procured by coercion or fraud and was not signed intelligently and voluntarily.

  2. State v. Nicholas J. (In re Tallulah J.)

    No. A-23-631 (Neb. Ct. App. May. 14, 2024)

    Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-106.01 (Reissue 2016), when a child shall have been relinquished by written instrument, as provided by Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-104 and 43-106 (Reissue 2016), to the Department of Health and Human Services or to a licensed child placement agency and the agency has, in writing, accepted full responsibility for the child, the person so relinquishing shall be relieved of all parental duties toward and all responsibilities for such child and have no rights over such child. See In re Interest of Zoey S., 22 Neb.App. 371, 853 N.W.2d 225 (2014).

  3. State v. Daniel M. (In re Ethan M.)

    860 N.W.2d 442 (Neb. Ct. App. 2015)

    However, when the evidence is in conflict, the appellate court will consider and give weight to the fact that the lower court observed the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts over the other. In re Interest of Zoey S., 22 Neb.App. 371, 853 N.W.2d 225 (2014).Neb.Rev.Stat. § 43–247 (Supp.