From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jerry Stephenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 2007
36 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 75.

January 30, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered July 14, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ellen Dille of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Rena Paul of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Williams, McGuire and Malone, JJ.


Defendant's argument that the People failed to prove the element of physical injury (Penal Law § 10.00) is unpreserved and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Were we to consider this claim, we would find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence supported the conclusion that the victim sustained physical injury ( see People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636). In the commission of the robbery, defendant went beyond the category of "petty slaps, shoves, kicks and the like delivered out of hostility, meanness and similar motives" ( Matter of Philip A., 49 NY2d 198, 200), when he punched the victim in the mouth and bit him on the biceps and shoulder, causing him to bleed, and the nature of the injuries supported the inference that they caused substantial pain. Accordingly, defendant was not prejudiced by the fact that his trial counsel made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal ( see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714; see also Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668). To the extent that defendant is also claiming that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to raise the physical injury issue in his summation, which focused on mi identification, that claim is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters of strategy not reflected in the record ( see People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709; People Love, 57 NY2d 998).


Summaries of

State v. Jerry Stephenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 2007
36 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Jerry Stephenson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERRY STEPHENSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 30, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 575
828 N.Y.S.2d 391

Citing Cases

People v. Wheeler

at by the time he was treated, the detective seemingly had recovered from the initial shock, any bleeding had…